The first observation that comes naturally from the progression of Alençon to roulette is this: if the statistics speak of series more than thirty strokes long, it is obvious that a series of this kind is likely, it is realizable, and that if it is contrary, it is necessary to suffer it. .
If, on the other hand, it appears favorable, which is equally likely, why should we stop at episode 67 which is only the twelfth? Okay, it is also possible to extend the series of numbers, making the necessary proportions, and bring it to twenty-four or even thirty-six digits, but can you imagine what figures would come out? Leaving aside the obstacle of the maximums, which could be circumvented in many ways, the game, even if it was a winner, would become a heart-pounding game.
We believe that the progression of Alençon is a suitable method to raise your adrenaline level to the maximum, and we declare ourselves against this type of violent game. https://rootcasino-ae.com/. The systems player must be calm and present to himself and these violent shocks certainly do not contribute to maintaining this state of mind that is vital to the game of roulette.
Dutch Upright or Stanislas Progression
The Dutch upright, also known under the name of Progression Stanislas, is a system based on the same principles as D’Alembert and provides the same performance by varying only in the application technique.
But we talk about it above all because many treatises and publications present it under the name of very elegant, very brilliant, and compare it to D’alembert, asserting that in this it is more convenient because, giving the same return, it requires an exposure of lower capital.
From our point of view and after numerous tests we can safely say that it is not always true, if we make a comparison with D’Alembert you will find that the reality is different.
Comparison between the Dutch Montante and D’Alembert
Comparison between two game methods widely used in the French Roulette game.
D’Alembert, in a favorable phase, i.e. in a trend towards equilibrium, returns to the lower bets. At some point, if the yield was such as to allow you to take an advantage, you can even give up on closing by abandoning small figures.
The Dutch upright, on the other hand, due to the fact of always canceling the small digits and always writing the larger ones, very hardly reaches a situation that allows an abandonment and, in any case, being larger digits, the number of those that can be abandoning will always be much lower than in the case of D’Alembert.
Compare these two methods, download your favorite casino software for free, and play the free money version. You can play without time limits and at no cost, experimenting with all our systems.